Model Leaderboard

⚖️

Independent rankings of frontier AI models across {boardCount} public benchmarks — switch models in the radar charts, read the trend, not a single number.

model entries

benchmarks

Arena 2026-10-15

latest arena snapshot

weekly

auto refresh

Disclaimer: All scores are third-party public benchmark snapshots (sources linked below), republished for reference only. The top of each leaderboard is often within statistical noise — read the trend, not the exact rank. We do not perform evaluations ourselves.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

independent evaluations Compare two models →

Aggregates 10 standardized benchmarks (coding, math, science, reasoning, agentic) into one intelligence index, with pricing and speed.

#	Model	Provider	Intell.	Coding	GPQA	HLE	SciCode	LCR	$/M tok	tok/s
1	Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	57.6	—	—	61.4	66.9	84.7	8.00	96
2	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	56.0	—	—	55.0	61.0	82.7	4.00	139
3	Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	56.0	—	—	57.5	65.0	84.7	8.00	86
4	Muse Wonder Full (Max)	Meta	55.8	—	—	53.6	62.6	83.7	0.00	0
5	Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	53.6	—	—	55.6	60.4	82.7	8.00	77
6	Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	53.4	81.6	93.7	59.1	63.1	85.3	20.00	74
7	Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	53.2	80.7	93.4	58.7	60.9	83.0	20.00	60
8	GPT-6 Astra (Max)	OpenAI	52.7	76.9	96.1	54.7	56.5	80.7	20.00	72
9	Gemini 4 Argon (High)	Google	52.6	—	—	57.1	61.8	79.7	4.00	0
10	Muse Wonder (Max)	Meta	52.4	—	—	50.1	60.3	80.7	8.00	159
11	GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)	OpenAI	52.4	75.9	96.3	54.6	55.7	80.0	20.00	65
12	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	51.9	—	—	50.0	57.3	79.7	4.00	105
13	GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)	OpenAI	51.8	—	—	52.9	54.2	83.0	4.00	54
14	Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	51.2	—	—	54.7	59.3	84.3	8.00	76
15	Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	51.2	79.1	90.6	55.9	58.7	83.7	20.00	55
16	GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)	OpenAI	51.0	—	—	52.6	55.7	79.7	4.00	52
17	GPT-6 Astra (High)	OpenAI	50.9	77.1	94.9	53.1	55.4	80.0	20.00	58
18	Claude Opus 5 (Max)	Anthropic	50.8	78.0	93.2	54.9	56.4	79.3	10.00	0
19	GPT-6.1 Sol (High)	OpenAI	50.2	—	—	51.4	55.8	82.3	4.00	49
20	Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)	Anthropic	49.7	77.0	93.7	54.4	55.7	80.3	10.00	0
21	Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)	Anthropic	49.6	76.5	92.6	55.5	61.0	82.3	20.00	0
22	GPT-6 Astra (Medium)	OpenAI	49.6	76.7	93.9	52.7	54.2	79.7	20.00	57
23	Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	48.9	77.1	88.6	53.8	56.4	84.7	20.00	55
24	Claude Opus 5 (High)	Anthropic	48.1	76.5	93.7	52.8	55.4	79.0	10.00	0
25	Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)	Meta	48.1	75.8	93.5	48.7	58.8	83.0	2.00	119
26	GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)	OpenAI	47.8	—	—	49.9	53.2	83.3	4.00	46
27	GPT-6 Sol (Max)	OpenAI	47.6	—	—	47.9	57.6	83.7	4.00	0
28	GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)	OpenAI	47.0	77.4	94.1	49.5	57.1	84.0	8.00	0
29	Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	46.8	75.2	88.1	48.9	56.7	82.3	20.00	54
30	Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	46.8	—	—	45.8	53.7	78.0	4.00	103

Capability Radar

Select a model to compare 6 capability axes (percent of max 100)

Model

Source: Artificial Analysis · snapshot 2026-10-19 · refreshes weekly

Arena Elo Ranking

human-preference blind voting

Anonymous A/B battles voted by real users, scored with Bradley–Terry Elo. Measures which model people actually prefer using — not a capability test.

#	Model	Provider	License	Elo	Votes	vs prev
1	Gemini 4 Argon (High)	google	Closed	1532	4,904	—
2	Claude Opus 5.5 (High)	anthropic	Closed	1516	8,300	—
3	Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)	anthropic	Closed	1512	14,590	—
4	Claude Opus 5 (Max)	anthropic	Closed	1508	32,495	—
5	Claude Opus 5 (High)	anthropic	Closed	1503	66,824	—
6	Claude Opus 4.6 (High)	anthropic	Closed	1502	81,394	—
7	Muse Wonder (Max)	meta	Closed	1501	3,247	—
8	Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)	google	Closed	1499	37,454	—
9	Claude Opus 4.6	anthropic	Closed	1498	86,071	—
10	Claude Fable 5 (High)	anthropic	Closed	1491	42,004	—
11	mimo-v2.6-pro	xiaomi	Closed	1491	4,075	▲ 2
12	Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)	meta	Closed	1490	17,561	—
13	Claude Opus 4.7 (High)	anthropic	Closed	1490	65,116	—
14	Gemini 3.7 Flash (High)	google	Closed	1487	27,232	—
15	Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh)	meta	Closed	1484	8,248	—
16	Claude Opus 4.7	anthropic	Closed	1483	66,216	—
17	qwen3.8-max	alibaba	Closed	1483	27,766	▲ 3
18	gemini-3.5-flash-high	google	Closed	1482	48,486	▲ 1
19	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	google	Closed	1480	127,649	—
20	Gemini 3 Pro	google	Closed	1479	42,072	—
21	gemini-3.6-flash-high	google	Closed	1479	36,122	▲ 1
22	Muse Spark 1.1	meta	Closed	1478	42,810	—
23	gemini-3.5-flash-medium	google	Closed	1477	47,292	—
24	qwen3.7-max-preview	alibaba	Closed	1475	3,934	—
25	Kimi K3 (Max)	moonshot	Closed	1475	32,795	—
26	Muse Spark	meta	Closed	1474	14,150	—
27	glm-5.3-max	zai	Closed	1471	22,543	—
28	gpt-5.5-high	openai	Closed	1471	69,401	—
29	glm-5.3-flash	zai	Closed	1471	32,925	—
30	claude-sonnet-5.5-xhigh	anthropic	Closed	1470	6,831	—

Elo trend since 2023 · 8 snapshots

Source: Arena leaderboard · snapshot 2026-10-15 · refreshes weekly

OpenCompass Capability Scores

knowledge · reasoning · math · code

Objective capability benchmark run on the official closed evaluation set. The average (avg) is the mean of the four dimension scores.

#	Model	Provider	License	Avg	Knowledge	Reasoning	Math	Code
1	Claude Opus 5 (high)	Anthropic	Closed	83.3	94.1	68.4	77.3	93.3
2	GPT-5.6-Sol (high)	OpenAI	Closed	80.8	88.5	66.8	71.4	96.3
3	Qwen3.8-Max	Alibaba	Open	80.6	86.8	65.2	75	95.5
4	GPT-5.5 (high)	OpenAI	Closed	80.6	87.7	66.9	71.4	96.5
5	Gemini-3.7-Flash	Google	Closed	80.5	94	62.1	76.8	89.3
6	Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)	ByteDance	Closed	80.5	91.4	64.9	74.9	90.8
7	Kimi-K3 (high)	Moonshot AI	Open	79.1	90.3	63.9	74.1	88
8	Grok-4.6 (high)	xAI	Closed	78	93.8	60	73	85
9	DeepSeek-V4-Pro	DeepSeek	Open	77.5	92.5	55.5	71.2	91
10	Kimi-K2.6 (high)	Moonshot AI	Open	75.7	89.8	62.9	75.7	74.5
11	Claude Opus 4.8 (high)	Anthropic	Closed	75.1	87.5	64.1	71.5	77.3
12	GLM-5.3	Zhipu AI	Closed	74.4	91.9	62	67.2	76.5
13	DeepSeek-V4-Flash	DeepSeek	Open	73.7	84.5	61	70.4	79
14	Hy3-preview (high)	Tencent	Open	73.6	85.6	54.6	72.2	82
15	MiniMax-M3	MiniMax	Open	69	86.6	54	63	72.5

Capability Radar

Select a model to compare 4 capability axes (percent of max 100)

Model

Source: OpenCompass (司南) · snapshot 2026-08-24 · updated monthly

SuperCLUE Intelligence Index

Chinese-language benchmark · max 100

Comprehensive Chinese benchmark covering six tasks: math reasoning, hallucination control, scientific reasoning, precise instruction following, agentic coding and agentic task planning.

#	Model	Provider	License	Total	Math	Halluc.	Science	Instruct	AgentCode	AgentPlan
1	Qwen3.8-Max(max)	阿里巴巴	Open	71.48	77.19	86.08	71.93	43.81	68.42	90.94
2	Kimi-K3(max)	月之暗面	Open	70.68	71.93	83.85	70.17	40.95	75.79	84.35
3	DeepSeek-V4-Pro(max)	深度求索	Open	70.1	77.19	89.73	71.93	42.86	63.16	85.48
4	Doubao-Seed-2.1-pro(high)	字节跳动	Closed	65.94	75.44	78.85	77.19	42.86	51.58	84.95
5	DeepSeek-V4-Flash(max)	深度求索	Open	65.6	78.95	78.25	70.17	35.24	58.95	80.72
6	MiniMax-M3	稀宇科技	Open	56.9	70.18	70.44	70.17	20	46.32	77.68
7	LongCat-2.0	美团	Open	54.22	70.18	70.02	64.91	19.05	42.11	71.32

Capability Radar

Select a model to compare 6 task axes (percent of max 100)

Model

Source: SuperCLUE · snapshot 2026-08-06 · updated monthly

Best by Capability

Which model leads each skill? Each board ranks the Top 10 using the source that measures that capability best — coding from the AA Coding Index, math and reasoning from OpenCompass, agentic from SuperCLUE.

#	Model	Provider	Coding
1	Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	81.6
2	Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	80.7
3	Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	79.1
4	Claude Opus 5 (Max)	Anthropic	78.0
5	GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)	OpenAI	77.4
6	GPT-6 Astra (High)	OpenAI	77.1
7	Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)	Anthropic	77.1
8	Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)	Anthropic	77.0
9	GPT-6 Astra (Max)	OpenAI	76.9
10	GPT-6 Astra (Medium)	OpenAI	76.7

Source: AA Coding Index · snapshot 2026-10-19 · refresh schedule per source

#	Model	Provider	Math
1	Claude Opus 5 (high)	Anthropic	77.3
2	Gemini-3.7-Flash	Google	76.8
3	Kimi-K2.6 (high)	Moonshot AI	75.7
4	Qwen3.8-Max	Alibaba	75.0
5	Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)	ByteDance	74.9
6	Kimi-K3 (high)	Moonshot AI	74.1
7	Grok-4.6 (high)	xAI	73.0
8	Hy3-preview (high)	Tencent	72.2
9	Claude Opus 4.8 (high)	Anthropic	71.5
10	GPT-5.6-Sol (high)	OpenAI	71.4

#	Model	Provider	Reasoning
1	Claude Opus 5 (high)	Anthropic	68.4
2	GPT-5.5 (high)	OpenAI	66.9
3	GPT-5.6-Sol (high)	OpenAI	66.8
4	Qwen3.8-Max	Alibaba	65.2
5	Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro-260628 (high)	ByteDance	64.9
6	Claude Opus 4.8 (high)	Anthropic	64.1
7	Kimi-K3 (high)	Moonshot AI	63.9
8	Kimi-K2.6 (high)	Moonshot AI	62.9
9	Gemini-3.7-Flash	Google	62.1
10	GLM-5.3	Zhipu AI	62.0

#	Model	Provider	Agentic
1	Kimi-K3(max)	月之暗面	75.8
2	Qwen3.8-Max(max)	阿里巴巴	68.4
3	DeepSeek-V4-Pro(max)	深度求索	63.2
4	DeepSeek-V4-Flash(max)	深度求索	59.0
5	Doubao-Seed-2.1-pro(high)	字节跳动	51.6
6	MiniMax-M3	稀宇科技	46.3
7	LongCat-2.0	美团	42.1

Source: SuperCLUE · snapshot 2026-08-06 · refresh schedule per source